Stella Braam: expert in undercover journalism

This article initially would be published on the website of my studies, but due to some problems I have to publish it here. Enjoy!

She had many false identities, she infiltrated in several (criminal) organizations and groups to make stories about them afterwards and she is a big supporter of ‘participating journalism’. I’m talking about Stella Braam, although she isn’t family of me. Braam operated as an undercover / participating journalist in the years 1992 to 2015. I met her recently in Café Scheltema in the city centre of Amsterdam, “the former journalists cafe of The Netherlands” according to Wim, owner of the café. 

Stella Braam is born in 1962 in Haarlem, but she grew up in the village of Someren, not very far from Eindhoven. When she got the chance to move to Amsterdam, she took it and and she instantly felt there in her element. She got her first journalism experiences in 1983 and her first undercover project was in begin of the 90s. She wrote many books, for example about the swaggers in Utrecht and Schiphol Airport, Turkish extreme rightwing supporters.

I wanted depth in my work”

 

Hi Stella, how did you enter the investigative journalism?

“I was 23 years and on a point of ‘what can I do in my life’. I could choose between two jobs: being a politician or journalist. Writing always played a role in my background, for my mother wrote alot, for example poems. After a few jobs at several editorial rooms, I made in 1992 a switch in my life. A colleague and me were writers at an producer’s office, what got work of the Ministry of Health and Sports. I found that too simple, ‘what am I doing here?’.”

“I wanted more depth in my work. I heard lots of the bottom of the job market, there was much low-educated youth. I decided to join them and I wanted to write a article about it. So that happened, De Groene Amsterdammer published it and the next day 4 publishers were on the phone. They all were interested in my story! That is the point I have got my first undercover experiences.”

Stella Braam has much experience of undercover journalism. Photo: Singel Uitgeverijen / Koos Breukel

Do you know in which way the journalism has been changed over the last years?

“There are less journalists with a permanent contract, due to budget cuts. I think half of the journalists nowadays are freelancers, the other half does have a permanent contract and they are overloaded. There was a short time the investigative journalism was bad. But then the Fonds van Bijzondere Journalistieke Projecten (Fund for Special Journalistic Projects, red.) was founded and later even some more initiatives and media, for example Follow The Money. Also crowdfunding is coming has came up recently.”

The normal reporting is too shallow”

 

I have read you have a different view to the use of undercover journalism. Can you explain that?

“The journalistic view of the use of this is moving. Initially it was a pretty taboo, for papers in particular. They considered it as sensation, they were convinced they have to use the open visor. Now most news media are over. I think journalists write about themes without much talking to people who are affected by those themes. The reporting is too shallow, I don’t want that. I rather see a longtaking impression about what is really going on in these undiscovered worlds.”

 

How will the investigative journalism be in 10 years according to you?

“I think there will be two developments. The first one is that data journalism will grow rapidly. The consequence of this is that participating journalism will grow later as well, journalists will talk more with people. The second trend is that journalism in general will be more international. Social media has caused this. As a result of it, the world will be much more smaller.”

Shooting pictures among shooting guns

This article initially would be published on the website of my studies, but due to some problems I have to publish it here. Enjoy!

From having a dinner together with Yesser Arafat, the former president of the Palestinian areas, to hanging on a jeep what is speeding very fast while escaping from an attack. The life of Bud Wichers isn’t that boring at all. The 42-years-old journalist has years of experience in covering stories in war zones. Where did he do his job? And what is his purpose of making those risky stories?

Although Wichers is born in Jakarta (Indonesia), he has been raised in a small village in the eastern part of The Netherlands. He currently lives in Indonesia with his girlfriend, a formal professional swimmer and actor for Dutch soap series (Goede Tijden, Slechte Tijden and Onderweg naar Morgen). Together, they have established Mijn Roots, a foundation that organises reunions between adopted children. Besides of his volunteer work, Wichers is a journalist and he covers stories from war zones.

He is a freelance reporter and he sells his stories and photos through his company called HumInt Media. From there, he made stories for press agencies (Thomson Reuters, AFP and ANP) and several broadcasts, for example VRT (Belgium), ITV News (United Kingdom) and and NTR (The Netherlands).

Also newspapers show his still pictures, these are published in the Dutch papers of Telegraaf, NRC and news sites in other countries. On top of these all, Wichers made some documentaries as well, examples are From Israel with Love, about the relationship between Israel and Palestina, and Guantanamo Bay, about the American detention centre for terrorists.

Bud Wichers records war situations. Photo: private collection

Long list of visited war countries

Wichers’s first touch with war journalism was during the Second Intifadah, which was between September 2000 and begin of 2005. He went to Ramallah, a city at the Palestinian West Bank. “In that time of fights between Israel and Palestina, people asked me how come people were killing each other every day over there”, he explains.

In the years after, the list of visiting countries of the war journalist grew quickly. “I was to Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestina so, Syria. I also reported the Arabian Spring, I visited Egypt and Libya that time,” Wichers sums up. And that’s not even all of his visited countries.

 

Sharper and more sceptic journalistic work

The freelance journalist has been figuring out social media, like Twitter and Youtube, have their good and their bad sites. He explains: “They are a blessing, because much information is posted on it. On the other hand social media are a curse, for information is not always reliable. Fake news is distributed by parties with their own agenda and profits.”

When he works, the Dutch journalist maintains his standard ‘trust nobody, unless proven otherwise’. And that has a reason. “In a war or armed conflict, every party (citizens, armies and even governments) wants to keep its profits safe.” According to Wichers, this causes that journalists become more sceptic and sharper.

In addition, journalists will be even the first victim in wars. “Everyone think they will be disadvantaged by the truth,” sees Wichers. “They fear journalists explore there is something wrong in these parties. For example: in the Arabic spring, the leaders of the countries didn’t want to know what is really happening.”

 

Journalist Wichers experienced some riskfull situations. Photo: private collection